Codex Resonance
/
Codex Commons
/
🧪
CC-PUB-GATE-01 — Structural Vocabulary v1.1 Publication Gate Test v0.1
🧪

CC-PUB-GATE-01 — Structural Vocabulary v1.1 Publication Gate Test v0.1

Test ID: CC-PUB-GATE-01

Version: 0.1

Date: 29 September 2026

Standing: INTERNAL — EXECUTED PUBLICATION-GATE TEST. No publication authorised.

Target: 📚Codex Structural Vocabulary v1.1 — Revision Candidate

Purpose

Test the v1.1 revision candidate against independent non-health/non-Arqua fixtures, established external semantic standards, the Commons Non-Promotion principle, and publication-boundary requirements.

Gate A — Independent-domain hostile fixtures

A1 — Software/API specification

Published Reference ≠ Accepted Design ≠ Implemented ≠ Observed.

Result: PASS.

A2 — Scientific research publication

Publication ≠ universal correctness. Association ≠ cause. Population evidence ≠ individual sufficiency.

Result: PASS.

A3 — Regulatory/legal guidance

Representation of regulatory authority ≠ creation of regulatory authority. Publication in Commons ≠ legal effect. Mapping ≠ adoption.

Result: PASS.

A4 — Cultural/custodial vocabulary

Representation / mapping ≠ custodial authority.

Result: PASS.

A5 — Vendor capability statement

Source assertion ≠ implementation ≠ observed behaviour ≠ conformance.

Result: PASS.

Gate B — External semantic-standard collision/reuse review

B1 — W3C PROV-O

Official source: PROV-O: The PROV Ontology

PROV-O already provides standard provenance concepts including Entity, Activity, Agent, attribution, association, derivation, revision and qualified relations.

Result: PASS WITH REUSE REQUIREMENT.

Commons should reuse PROV-O where machine-readable provenance is later authorised rather than implement competing provenance machinery.

B2 — W3C SKOS

Official source: SKOS Reference

SKOS provides mapping relations including closeMatch and exactMatch with defined semantics.

Result: PASS WITH QUALIFICATION REQUIREMENT.

QMAP/Commons should reuse SKOS mapping predicates where their semantics fit and preserve purpose, basis, scope, evidence and standing around those mappings.

B3 — OWL 2

Official source: OWL 2 Overview

OWL sameness and class/property equivalence have formal entailment consequences distinct from purpose-qualified semantic mapping.

Result: PASS WITH NEW v1.1 CLARIFICATION REQUIRED.

Codex equivalence is qualified equivalence for a declared purpose/scope unless a stronger external equivalence relation is explicitly asserted under that relation's own semantics.

Therefore qualified semantic equivalence ≠ formal identity.

B4 — SHACL

Official sources: SHACL and SHACL 1.2 Core

SHACL defines graph constraints and validation. Future machine-readable implementation should bind to an explicit SHACL version.

Result: PASS WITH VERSION BOUNDARY.

SHACL validation/conformance result ≠ institutional acceptance, authority or runtime admissibility.

Gate C — Non-Promotion consistency

  • canonical Commons standing → external authority: BLOCKED;
  • mapping → identity: BLOCKED;
  • qualified equivalence → OWL identity: BLOCKED;
  • evidence sufficient for P1 → sufficient for P2: BLOCKED;
  • interpretation → fact/cause: BLOCKED;
  • new version → rewritten history: BLOCKED;
  • validation/conformance → enterprise acceptance: BLOCKED.

Result: STRONG PASS.

Overall result

PASS WITH ONE REQUIRED AMENDMENT.

After the Equivalence clarification is incorporated, the semantic-content gate may close as PUBLICATION-READY CANDIDATE — OWNER DECISION STILL REQUIRED.

This does not publish v1.1, supersede v1.0, or authorise RDF/OWL/JSON-LD/SHACL, GitHub, API or MCP implementation.

Decision

CC-PUB-GATE-01 — PASS WITH REQUIRED EQUIVALENCE AMENDMENT.